Re: Attention, parents of CMU students!

BarbaralovesMarty@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message
news:<4c418fa.0310160903.154fd22d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:<bmkm57$6g@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...
> > "Barbara Schwarz" <BarbaraSchwarz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:8385d874.0310150715.3e76854e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > WARNING
> > 
> > (Garbage deleted)
> > 
> > Ever hear of the freedom of speech?
> > 
> > Everything on that site is publically available.
> > 
> > Have a good day.
> > 
> > Jeff
> 
> Jeff, there are limitations to freedom of speech. ***ual harassment is
> no freedom of speech, and telling people how to make bombs is no
> freedom of speech either, because people may have to die as a result
> of that information.
> 
> This earth is not a sane place. Even if you put a little note
> underneath your bomb instructions and information about how to throw
> bombs in police cars, that people should not do that, Dave Touretzky,
> you, and anybody else knows that there are numerous people who just
> want to blow up others and they screw the law and warnings. Touretzky
> claims no responsibilty for what other crazy people construct and
> build after the instructions on his website, but he tells them how to
> do that. What a dangerous s****!
> 
> Only because there are also other criminals out there who tell
> terrorists on the web how to blow up things and people, doesn't mean
> for Touretzky, a university educator (!) to act same reckless.
> 
> I also remind you that the young man who had the same bomb
> instructions on his website was arrested by the FBI. His website was
> removed. What do you think makes Touretzky innocent by putting that
> dangerous stuff back on his site?
> 
> There are millions of example in which Touretzky could make his point
> on freedom of speech. Endangering other peoples'lives and degrading
> others through ***ual perversions, persecuting religion, are the worst
> examples!
> 
> Anyway, Jeff, if you, or anybody you love will be disabled or killed
> through a bomb that was build after Touretzky's or another madman's
> instructions, you will be a changed man. You will regret your words
> that freedom of speech should allow detailed information on how to
> build and throw bombs. The world is too crazy for that information,
> how come you have not noticed that?
> 
> The right to live unharmed is a constituional right that is superior
> to freedom of speech. If freedom of speech harms or endangers the
> constitutional right of people to live a peaceful and happy life, you
> can't say it. It would be unconstitutional. Touretzky's bomb
> instructions are unconstitutional because he endangers other
> constitutional rights. His persecution of religion also violates the
> First Amendment.
> 
> Barbara Schwarz

Barbara, I agree with your concern. I think that freedom of speech can
go a little too far. If "Freedom of Speach" allows people to promote
criminal behavior, easily accessed to ALL ages, then there is
something terribly wrong with our society. And people actually
allowing it, and standing up for it is sickening to me. We have been
fighting to keep terrorists out of our country, while our own citizens
are standing up for people who have no respect for human life, and
glorify the terror.

It is sad how people can be so dillusional.

-Gerome