"woo" <nomail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:6%3ff.43$%z5.4483@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What if the government or a company would begin
> installing cameras on the streets for using the recorded
> information for free business and or government purposes?
>
> That would be something called "Orwellianism" and
> would bother the public and such act would possibly
> represent crimes against humanity for ignoring people's
> freedom and dignity to live in peace.
>
> But how come the Internet does not count in this
> regard? People turn to the Internet, and the first thing that
> happens is that their chit chats get archived and
> distributed by say, Google Inc. It hurts. In fact Google
> specializes on collecting all public materials, builds search
> engines to them, and attaches advertisements to the
> information.
>
> How long can Google's archiving of private personal
> conducts in say "usenet, one of the founding elements
> of the Internet", where people turn for personal
> questions and carry discussions in specific purpose
> discussion forums go on without people turning to deal
> with the privacy violation millions run into and left
> humiliated?
Usenet is totally public, there is ZERO privacy and should be ZERO
expectation of same.
|
