It seems like if they did comparisons between peoples health based on the
> type of pollution their cities get and everything else was the same like
> diet, the people who consistently get moderate or worse (not
> good)pollution are in worse health for any number of
categories.Obviously
> the ratings epa use is not adequate or worse blindly harming people by
> making people feel moderate is not dangerous when in fact it VERY well
may
> be causing people to lose their health faster. The conspiracy to allow
> this to go on without adequately warning people or diminishing the
threat,
> or showing such studies, or allowing harmed people to sue epa or
polluters
> shows that a, there are millions of people that are not protected from
the
> dangers of pollution in America, b, that the measures to reduce
pollution
> are not matched by the extent of the damage relevant to potential
danger,
> thus making the policy to lower pollution useless in some areas, and c,
> and those unprotected people not only usually lose their health faster
in
> any number of categories of ailments, but they then have to pay for
> conditions that basically they are not responsible for getting and
usually
> they can't sue . The media calls all this basically global warming and
> energy reduction instead of the conspiracy to not allow rules to do more
> faster to protect them equally like others that don't get this pollution
> are protected. Why don't the media do more? Because they are eagerly
> taking the money from the companies and pharmacies that treat you after
> people are poisoned, like from cancer clinics and heart hospitals and
old
> age homes, and pharmeceuticals especially for asthma and nebulizers and
> power chairs. Its almost surreal to listen to the lies the news casters
> call beautiful days of good air.Yes sometimes they say gorgeous and good
> air when the particulate rates are approaching warning level. This is
the
> lies and protection that begets big money while politicians remain
silent.
Ever ask a reporter why Bush is not concerned about rules that make
polluters and energy earn more money while many people suffer and are not
allowed to sue. Ever see a reporter ask Bush if we could see a penny fon
the
ground rom space in the 1960s how we can't defeat or track a group of
terrorists with planes or coordinated communication system?
Ever see a reporter ask if we are worried about terrorists why do we allow
so many people from terrorists into this country? Discrimination is not
good, but when only those people are a threat to blow up people enmass,
one
might ask why millions or close are allowed to come over and then worry
afterwards of the potential danger?
You think there are no conspiracies? Yahoo took the message boards off
because too much free information , that which we tell other countries to
have is not really prudent. I was on a blog about my city and when I
talked
about pollution I was off.. There goes the hypocrisy of freedom.
You think reporters would talk about pollution, the descrepency between
rich
and poor, the tens of thousands who are murdered and nothing much is ever
done about it or why its never a coordinated effort to do more about yet
we
criticize those countries that have people killing each other there?
You don't believe in conspiracies ?
Since I lost my health to pollution, I had my real estate go up, had my
taxes reviewed by Irs and made to pay money although we are repealling,
and
pay more money to treat conditions that are not my fault without any free
press to go over why?
You don't believe in conspiracies in the US are you sure?
Incidentally in case you were not aware,, yahoo often knew what you were
writing before you even sent it and could adequately block it if it went
against govt or own rules for whatever the hell reason!!!!! Thats how
advanced intelligence is now but I am sure your not going to believe
that...
|
