and politicians and media to prove or disprove that moderate or worse
pollution, exposed to populations in certain cities over and over again is
safe . I challenge lawyers, government officials and medical scientists,
to
show that air quality with or without more co2 and which measures moderate
particulate or and or ozone levels ( in reading that are not good on
charts) or worse consistently, over and over again doesn't in fact show
more illness and morbidity and diminished lung function for the people
exposed then people who get good air consistently and they both ate the
same things (generally speaking).. That damage I attest and differences in
health and lost production and costs from health care, are more
contrasting the longer the people are exposed compared to people who get
cleaner air. I think if stress tests and lung function and cancers were
compared one can show proof now of harm and SOME people are not protected
or told to adequately protect their families or to get warnings to get out
of harms way. I think the damages and what to do about it is swept under
the
rug for lots of reasons. Lawyers must look at the ramifications of people
not protected from undue harm and damages that resulted. ,, Energy
companies, diesel engines and coal and pollution is harming some people
more
then others and they are not being told or protected,, which to me is a
mass
poisoning going on. Call it global warming or call it pollution do the
studies to show what I think is the largest poisoning of Some people in
decades to hide energy control of politicians .
|
