Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


College > College > Re: Former Gene...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 5 Topic 304 of 419
Post > Topic >>

Re: Former General Decries Official Government Version Of 911

by "Termagnard" <Termagesa@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 26, 2006 at 05:52 PM

"Gray Shockley" <grayshockley@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C10FEDA60010FDEBF0284530@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:27:36 -0500, Termagnard wrote:
>
> > Former Two-Star General Decries Official  Government Version  Of  911
Attacks
> > 7-19-6
> >
> > The fifth anniversary of September 11, as well as the first
anniversary of
> > the reauthorization of the USA PATRIOT Act,
> > is looming around the corner and there are still many unanswered
questions
> > concerning the horrendous tragedy inflicted
> > upon New York City and the United States of America.
> >
> > One question, however, seems to have been answered quite clearly by
retired
> > Major General Albert Stubblebine. The
> > question: Did a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?
> >
> > The answer is astoni****ng.
>
> Not a bit. There was a *major* traffic tie-up around the Pentagon on
7/11 and
> at least a thousand people saw the plane (right above their cars) and
saw
> (and/or heard) it hit.

True, many conflicting testmonies, you can read it all here.
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/witnesses.html

< Snip for space>

> <http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/2001/dec%202001/1201bauer.htm>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Major General Stubblebine admits, "I measured pieces of Soviet
equipment from
>
> > photographs?I look at the hole in the
> > Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to
have hit
> > the Pentagon. The plane does not fit in
> > that hole. So what DID hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it?
What's
> > going on?"
>
>
> Well, Sir, why don't you get one of your "Remote Viewers" to answer
those
> questions?
>
> It might be interesting to point out that
>
> <http://www.psitech.net/lecture.htm>
>
> Major General Albert N. Stubblebine, III, (retired) in 1992 - other
dates
> unknown) was - among other things, "The following speech was given by
Major
> General Stubblebine, an im****tant advocate of the military use of Psi
and
> related techniques. This took place at the International Symposium on
UFO
> Research Sponsored by the International Association for New Science
Denver,
> Colorado, May 22-25, 1992.
>
> (Introduction by Dr. Steven Greer of Gen. (Ret.) Stubblebine's military
> career as Commanding officer of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security
> Command (INSCOM), his efforts to study unusual human performance for the
> Army, his involvement as Chairman of the Board of Directors of PSI TECH,
his
> association with TREAT and with Soviet Technology Transfer, etc.)"
>
>
> > Major General Stubblebine, at one point in his distinguished
> > military career, was in charge of Imagery Interpretation for
> > Scientific and Technical Intelligence.
>
>
> And that has a bearing on the plane cra****ng into the Pentagon in just
what
> way?

He can tell from the entry hole is too small to fit the B757. Take a look
at the photos at this site.
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/pentagon/what-hit-it.htm

>I've done a mite of imagery interpretation and would certainly never
> bother with it when I can drive to the scene and talk to eyewitnesses.

That is good. Do that.

> The reason the name rang a bell (pun was unintentional) is that several
of
> his (contract, I assume) employees have been on the Art Bell Show (a
waking
> insomniac's friend) and that's where I first heard of "Remote Viewing".
[The
> job every 13-year-old boy dreams of and wants /right now/!]
>
>
> Gray Shockley
> -------------------------------------------
> For every complex problem there is an answer
> that is clear, simple, and wrong. Ê- H. L. Mencken
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > He can be seen visibly angered
> > while speaking about the Pentagon and the
> > supposed airplane crash in the newly released do***entary, "One Nation
Under
> > Siege." The clip is available at
> > www.undersiegemovie.com/moreinfo.html
> > http://www.undersiegemovie.com/moreinfo.html
> >
> > Other questions about the September 11 attacks are raised in the
BridgeStone
> > Media Group/Power Hour Production DVD
> > expose' "9-11 In Plane Site." The loss of our civil liberties as a
direct
> > result of the USA PATRIOT Act is addressed in
> > the newest do***entary, "One Nation Under Siege."
> >
> > For more information, please go to
> > www.undersiegemovie.com
> > http://www.undersiegemovie.com/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Former General Decries Official Government Version Of 911
"Termagnard" &l  2006-08-21 16:27:36 
Re: Former General Decries Official Government Version Of 911
Gray Shockley <graysho  2006-08-21 23:09:26 
Re: Former General Decries Official Government Version Of 911
"Termagnard" &l  2006-08-26 17:52:20 
Re: Former General Decries Official Government Version Of 911
"al walker" <  2006-08-30 15:56:47 
Re: Former General Decries Official Government Version Of 911
"Alan Erskine"   2006-08-30 20:32:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Aug 29 22:33:23 CDT 2008.